Nikon P330 vs Olympus VR-340
92 Imaging
37 Features
48 Overall
41
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Nikon P330 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F1.8-5.6) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Announced March 2013
- Old Model is Nikon P310
- Refreshed by Nikon P340
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Nikon P330 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Nikon P330 and Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the P330 (12MP) and VR-340 (16MP) and the P330 (1/1.7") and VR-340 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe P330 was introduced 14 months later than the VR-340 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the P330 grades vs the VR-340 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Nikon P330 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix P330 and Olympus VR-340. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon P330 Gallery and Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P330 over the Olympus VR-340
P330 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2013 | January 2012 | Fresher by 14 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Crisper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Nikon P330
VR-340 | P330 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P330 and Olympus VR-340
P330 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Nikon P330 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon P330 features physical dimensions of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Nikon P330 and Olympus VR-340 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the P330 against the VR-340.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the P330 and VR-340 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Nikon P330 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the P330 and VR-340.
As you can see, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The P330 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VR-340 will produce more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger P330 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Nikon P330 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P330 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P330 | Olympus VR-340 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P330 | Olympus VR-340 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-03-04 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-5.6 | f/3.0-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.50 m | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720p (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 200g (0.44 pounds) | 125g (0.28 pounds) |
Dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 54 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 213 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $500 | $130 |