Nikon P330 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
92 Imaging
37 Features
48 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Nikon P330 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F1.8-5.6) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Announced March 2013
- Replaced the Nikon P310
- Newer Model is Nikon P340
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon P330 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Nikon P330 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Nikon and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the P330 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the P330 (1/1.7") and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe P330 was brought out 11 months before the WG-4 GPS so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the P330 grades against the WG-4 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Nikon P330 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix P330 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon P330 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P330 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| P330 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Nikon P330
| WG-4 GPS | P330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 | March 2013 | Fresher by 11 months |
Common features in the Nikon P330 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| P330 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Nikon P330 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Nikon P330 offers physical measurements of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Examine the Nikon P330 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the P330 versus the WG-4 GPS.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the P330 and WG-4 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Nikon P330 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading specs. The visual here will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the P330 and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The P330 due to its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will offer more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The older P330 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon P330 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon P330 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P330 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P330 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-03-04 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.50 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720p (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 200 grams (0.44 pounds) | 235 grams (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 54 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 213 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 images | 240 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $500 | $210 |