Nikon P330 vs Ricoh WG-M1
92 Imaging
37 Features
48 Overall
41
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Nikon P330 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F1.8-5.6) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Launched March 2013
- Old Model is Nikon P310
- Successor is Nikon P340
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Nikon P330 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Nikon P330 versus Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Ricoh. The resolution of the P330 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively similar but the P330 (1/1.7") and WG-M1 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe P330 was revealed 18 months earlier than the WG-M1 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the P330 grades vs the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Nikon P330 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P330 and Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are available at Nikon P330 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P330 over the Ricoh WG-M1
P330 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 115k | Crisper screen (+806k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Nikon P330
WG-M1 | P330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2014 | March 2013 | Newer by 18 months |
Common features in the Nikon P330 and Ricoh WG-M1
P330 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Nikon P330 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Nikon P330 has exterior dimensions of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the Nikon P330 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the P330 against the WG-M1.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the P330 and WG-M1 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Nikon P330 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading technical specs. The image here will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the P330 and WG-M1.
As you can tell, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The P330 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Ricoh WG-M1 will offer more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged P330 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon P330 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P330 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P330 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Ricoh |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P330 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2013-03-04 | 2014-09-12 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-5.6 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 1.5" |
Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 115k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720p (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 200 gr (0.44 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 54 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 213 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 images | 350 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $500 | $2,000 |