Nikon P7100 vs Sony W290
82 Imaging
34 Features
55 Overall
42
94 Imaging
34 Features
28 Overall
31
Nikon P7100 vs Sony W290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-200mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 395g - 116 x 77 x 48mm
- Released February 2012
- Earlier Model is Nikon P7000
- Replacement is Nikon P7700
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Nikon P7100 vs Sony W290 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Nikon P7100 versus Sony W290, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Nikon and Sony. The image resolution of the P7100 (10MP) and the W290 (12MP) is fairly similar but the P7100 (1/1.7") and W290 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe P7100 was announced 3 years later than the W290 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the P7100 matches up versus the W290 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon P7100 vs Sony W290 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix P7100 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290. The whole galleries are available at Nikon P7100 Gallery and Sony W290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P7100 over the Sony W290
| P7100 | W290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 | February 2009 | Fresher by 37 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W290 over the Nikon P7100
| W290 | P7100 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon P7100 and Sony W290
| P7100 | W290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Nikon P7100 vs Sony W290 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Nikon P7100 enjoys exterior dimensions of 116mm x 77mm x 48mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Sony W290 has sizing of 98mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Nikon P7100 versus Sony W290 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the P7100 vs the W290.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the P7100 and W290 is 82 and 94 respectively.
Nikon P7100 vs Sony W290 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the P7100 and W290.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The P7100 having a larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Sony W290 will offer greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher P7100 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Nikon P7100 vs Sony W290 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon P7100 vs Sony W290 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P7100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Sony |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix P7100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-02-20 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 99 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 921k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD monitor with anti- reflection coating and 5-level brightness adjustment | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 80 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.3fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.00 m | 3.90 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto with red-eye reduction, Fill flash, Manual, Slow sync, Rear curtain flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 395 gr (0.87 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 77 x 48mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 1.9") | 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 41 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 19.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 165 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 second delay) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $750 | $230 |