Nikon P7700 vs Olympus 8010
82 Imaging
36 Features
70 Overall
49
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 392g - 119 x 73 x 50mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Earlier Model is Nikon P7100
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 8010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon P7700 vs Olympus 8010 Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Nikon P7700 vs Olympus 8010, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the P7700 (12MP) and the 8010 (13MP) is fairly comparable but the P7700 (1/1.7") and 8010 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe P7700 was brought out 3 years later than the 8010 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the P7700 grades vs the 8010 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon P7700 vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix P7700 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon P7700 Gallery & Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P7700 over the Olympus 8010
| P7700 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2013 | February 2010 | Fresher by 41 months | |
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Nikon P7700
| 8010 | P7700 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon P7700 and Olympus 8010
| P7700 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon P7700 has outside dimensions of 119mm x 73mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 392 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus 8010 has proportions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon P7700 vs Olympus 8010 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the P7700 versus the 8010.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the P7700 and 8010 is 82 and 92 respectively.
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The graphic below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the P7700 and 8010.
All in all, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The P7700 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus 8010 will produce extra detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The younger P7700 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P7700 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix P7700 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
| Also called as | - | mju Tough 8010 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-05-28 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 13MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 99 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.0 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (15, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 392 grams (0.86 lbs) | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 73 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 53 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 191 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL14 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $499 | $600 |