Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-310
82 Imaging
36 Features
70 Overall
49
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 392g - 119 x 73 x 50mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Old Model is Nikon P7100
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-310, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the P7700 (12MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the P7700 (1/1.7") and TG-310 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe P7700 was brought out 2 years after the TG-310 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the P7700 grades vs the TG-310 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix P7700 & Olympus TG-310. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon P7700 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P7700 over the Olympus TG-310
| P7700 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2013 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 30 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Nikon P7700
| TG-310 | P7700 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon P7700 and Olympus TG-310
| P7700 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Nikon P7700 has got external dimensions of 119mm x 73mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") and a weight of 392 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-310 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the P7700 vs the TG-310.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the P7700 and TG-310 is 82 and 94 respectively.
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specifications. The pic underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the P7700 and TG-310.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The P7700 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus TG-310 will resolve more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos more aggressively. The newer P7700 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P7700 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P7700 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-05-28 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 99 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.0 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (15, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 392g (0.86 lbs) | 155g (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 73 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 53 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 191 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 pictures | 150 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL14 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $499 | $0 |