Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-610
82 Imaging
37 Features
70 Overall
50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67a34/67a3460404a05b3aab5bd9203e69096eb33afe63" alt="Nikon Coolpix P7700 front Nikon Coolpix P7700 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01ae1/01ae1246b008c2c1438d02f27195e5dcd053dfef" alt="Olympus TG-610 front Olympus TG-610 front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 392g - 119 x 73 x 50mm
- Announced May 2013
- Earlier Model is Nikon P7100
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Released January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-610, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the P7700 (12MP) and the TG-610 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the P7700 (1/1.7") and TG-610 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The P7700 was unveiled 2 years after the TG-610 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the P7700 matches up against the TG-610 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix P7700 and Olympus TG-610. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon P7700 Gallery and Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P7700 over the Olympus TG-610
P7700 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 30 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Nikon P7700
TG-610 | P7700 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P7700 and Olympus TG-610
P7700 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon P7700 has got external dimensions of 119mm x 73mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") and a weight of 392 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus TG-610 has proportions of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-610 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the P7700 vs the TG-610.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd17a/bd17a10c7122555bb19d8ecfe8b3af53db9b32e8" alt="Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-610 size comparison Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-610 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the P7700 and TG-610 is 82 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36685/3668577a6f2d04bda5b59698a266664fccee3907" alt="Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-610 top view buttons comparison Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-610 top view buttons comparison"
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at specifications. The picture here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the P7700 and TG-610.
To sum up, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The P7700 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-610 will give you greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent P7700 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3dc2/a3dc2b3567f130a486304a3d41dfbb51ad3296b5" alt="Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-610 sensor size comparison Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-610 sensor size comparison"
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86ff1/86ff17ce7cbdeff8f3096d32c5f8710b7c9ed669" alt="Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P7700 | Olympus TG-610 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix P7700 | Olympus TG-610 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2013-05-28 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 99 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.0 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 921k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 4.20 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (15, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 392 grams (0.86 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 119 x 73 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 53 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 191 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 210 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL14 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $499 | $223 |