Nikon P7700 vs Sony S2000
82 Imaging
37 Features
70 Overall
50
![Nikon Coolpix P7700 front Nikon Coolpix P7700 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-P7700/Nikon-P7700-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S2000/Sony-S2000-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Nikon P7700 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 392g - 119 x 73 x 50mm
- Announced May 2013
- Superseded the Nikon P7100
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Nikon P7700 vs Sony S2000 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Nikon P7700 vs Sony S2000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Sony. The sensor resolution of the P7700 (12MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is pretty close but the P7700 (1/1.7") and S2000 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The P7700 was brought out 3 years later than the S2000 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a quick summation of how the P7700 scores vs the S2000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Nikon P7700 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix P7700 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The entire galleries are available at Nikon P7700 Gallery and Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P7700 over the Sony S2000
P7700 | S2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 42 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Nikon P7700
S2000 | P7700 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P7700 and Sony S2000
P7700 | S2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Nikon P7700 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon P7700 enjoys external measurements of 119mm x 73mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") and a weight of 392 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Sony S2000 has dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Nikon P7700 vs Sony S2000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the P7700 vs the S2000.
![Nikon P7700 vs Sony S2000 size comparison Nikon P7700 vs Sony S2000 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P7700-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S2000-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the P7700 and S2000 is 82 and 93 respectively.
![Nikon P7700 vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison Nikon P7700 vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P7700-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S2000-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon P7700 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by researching specs. The graphic here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the P7700 and S2000.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The P7700 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Nikon P7700 will result in extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots way more aggressively. The younger P7700 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
![Nikon P7700 vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison Nikon P7700 vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P7700-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S2000-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon P7700 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon P7700 vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon P7700 vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P7700-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S2000-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Nikon P7700 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P7700 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Sony |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P7700 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-05-28 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 99 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.0 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 921k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 3.30 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (15, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 392g (0.86 pounds) | 167g (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 73 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 53 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 191 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL14 | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $499 | $225 |