Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
82 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 399g - 119 x 78 x 50mm
- Announced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Nikon P7800 and Olympus TG-820 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the P7800 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is fairly similar but the P7800 (1/1.7") and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe P7800 was announced 22 months after the TG-820 iHS making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summary of how the P7800 grades vs the TG-820 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix P7800 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Nikon P7800 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P7800 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| P7800 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2013 | February 2012 | Newer by 22 months | |
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Nikon P7800
| TG-820 iHS | P7800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1030k | 921k | Sharper display (+109k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon P7800 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| P7800 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
| Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Nikon P7800 enjoys physical dimensions of 119mm x 78mm x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") with a weight of 399 grams (0.88 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Nikon P7800 and Olympus TG-820 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the P7800 against the TG-820 iHS.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the P7800 and TG-820 iHS is 82 and 92 respectively.
Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading specifications. The picture below should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the P7800 and TG-820 iHS.
To sum up, both of those cameras come with the identical megapixel count but different sensor dimensions. The P7800 contains the larger sensor which will make obtaining shallow DOF less difficult. The more modern P7800 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P7800 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P7800 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-11-25 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 99 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.0 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 1,030k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 921k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p); high-speed: 1920 x 1080 (15 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 399 gr (0.88 pounds) | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 78 x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 54 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 200 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 220 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL14 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $550 | $500 |