Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX2
82 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 399g - 119 x 78 x 50mm
- Released November 2013
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Nikon P7800 and Ricoh CX2, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Nikon and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the P7800 (12MP) and CX2 (9MP) and the P7800 (1/1.7") and CX2 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe P7800 was unveiled 4 years later than the CX2 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the P7800 scores against the CX2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P7800 and Ricoh CX2. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon P7800 Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P7800 over the Ricoh CX2
| P7800 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 | August 2009 | Fresher by 52 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Nikon P7800
| CX2 | P7800 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon P7800 and Ricoh CX2
| P7800 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
| Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Nikon P7800 enjoys exterior measurements of 119mm x 78mm x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") and a weight of 399 grams (0.88 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Look at the Nikon P7800 and Ricoh CX2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the P7800 and the CX2.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the P7800 and CX2 is 82 and 93 respectively.
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing just by seeing technical specs. The graphic here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the P7800 and CX2.
As you can tell, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The P7800 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Nikon P7800 will produce extra detail having an extra 3MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The newer P7800 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P7800 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P7800 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-11-25 | 2009-08-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 99 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.0 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 921k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 921k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p); high-speed: 1920 x 1080 (15 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 399 gr (0.88 lb) | 185 gr (0.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 78 x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 54 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 200 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL14 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $550 | $341 |