Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh WG-30
82 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 399g - 119 x 78 x 50mm
- Introduced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh WG-30, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Nikon and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the P7800 (12MP) and WG-30 (16MP) and the P7800 (1/1.7") and WG-30 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe P7800 was launched 10 months before the WG-30 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the P7800 scores vs the WG-30 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix P7800 & Ricoh WG-30. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon P7800 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P7800 over the Ricoh WG-30
| P7800 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Nikon P7800
| WG-30 | P7800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2014 | November 2013 | Newer by 10 months |
Common features in the Nikon P7800 and Ricoh WG-30
| P7800 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Nikon P7800 features outside dimensions of 119mm x 78mm x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") having a weight of 399 grams (0.88 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh WG-30 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the P7800 and the WG-30.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the P7800 and WG-30 is 82 and 91 respectively.
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specs. The picture below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the P7800 and WG-30.
All in all, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The P7800 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh WG-30 will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged P7800 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P7800 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P7800 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-11-25 | 2014-10-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 99 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 921k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p); high-speed: 1920 x 1080 (15 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 399 grams (0.88 lb) | 192 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 78 x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 54 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 200 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL14 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $550 | $428 |