Nikon P80 vs Samsung WB150F
75 Imaging
33 Features
33 Overall
33
![Nikon Coolpix P80 front Nikon Coolpix P80 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-P80/Nikon-P80-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB150F front Samsung WB150F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB150F/Samsung-WB150F-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Nikon P80 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 405g - 110 x 79 x 78mm
- Launched January 2009
- Successor is Nikon P90
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Nikon P80 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Nikon P80 vs Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Nikon and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the P80 (10MP) and WB150F (14MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The P80 was manufactured 4 years before the WB150F and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Nikon P80 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the P80 grades vs the WB150F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Nikon P80 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix P80 and Samsung WB150F. The entire galleries are available at Nikon P80 Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P80 over the Samsung WB150F
P80 | WB150F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Nikon P80
WB150F | P80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 36 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon P80 and Samsung WB150F
P80 | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Nikon P80 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Nikon P80 features external measurements of 110mm x 79mm x 78mm (4.3" x 3.1" x 3.1") having a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Look at the Nikon P80 vs Samsung WB150F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the P80 versus the WB150F.
![Nikon P80 vs Samsung WB150F size comparison Nikon P80 vs Samsung WB150F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P80-vs-Samsung-WB150F-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the P80 and WB150F is 75 and 93 respectively.
![Nikon P80 vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison Nikon P80 vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P80-vs-Samsung-WB150F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon P80 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements simply by viewing specs. The visual underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the P80 and WB150F.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung WB150F to render more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The older P80 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
![Nikon P80 vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison Nikon P80 vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P80-vs-Samsung-WB150F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon P80 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon P80 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon P80 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P80-vs-Samsung-WB150F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Nikon P80 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P80 | Samsung WB150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Samsung |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P80 | Samsung WB150F |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-01-15 | 2012-01-09 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-486mm (18.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.0 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480, 15/30 fps, 320 x 240, 15 fps, 160 x 120, 15 fps | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 405g (0.89 lbs) | 188g (0.41 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 79 x 78mm (4.3" x 3.1" x 3.1") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | EN-EL5 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $400 | $230 |