Nikon P900 vs Panasonic FZ35
52 Imaging
40 Features
63 Overall
49
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 899g - 140 x 103 x 137mm
- Announced March 2015
- Renewed by Nikon P1000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Announced July 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FZ38
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Nikon P900 and Panasonic FZ35, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the P900 (16MP) and FZ35 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe P900 was announced 4 years after the FZ35 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the P900 matches up versus the FZ35 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix P900 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon P900 Gallery & Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P900 over the Panasonic FZ35
P900 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2015 | July 2010 | Newer by 57 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Nikon P900
FZ35 | P900 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P900 and Panasonic FZ35
P900 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon P900 comes with exterior measurements of 140mm x 103mm x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") having a weight of 899 grams (1.98 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ35 has dimensions of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
See the Nikon P900 and Panasonic FZ35 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the P900 versus the FZ35.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the P900 and FZ35 is 52 and 72 respectively.
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the P900 and FZ35.
All in all, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Nikon P900 to result in greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger P900 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Panasonic |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2015-03-02 | 2010-07-06 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Expeed C2 | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 921k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 921k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 8.50 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p) 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 899 gr (1.98 lb) | 397 gr (0.88 lb) |
Dimensions | 140 x 103 x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL23 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $600 | $999 |