Nikon P900 vs Panasonic ZS35
52 Imaging
41 Features
63 Overall
49
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 899g - 140 x 103 x 137mm
- Released March 2015
- Successor is Nikon P1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Released January 2014
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS30
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS40
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Below is a complete review of the Nikon P900 and Panasonic ZS35, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Nikon and Panasonic. The image resolution of the P900 (16MP) and the ZS35 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe P900 was announced 14 months later than the ZS35 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Nikon P900 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the P900 scores against the ZS35 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P900 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon P900 Gallery and Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P900 over the Panasonic ZS35
P900 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2015 | January 2014 | More recent by 14 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Nikon P900
ZS35 | P900 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P900 and Panasonic ZS35
P900 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Nikon P900 enjoys exterior dimensions of 140mm x 103mm x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") and a weight of 899 grams (1.98 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS35 has specifications of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon P900 and Panasonic ZS35 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the P900 against the ZS35.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the P900 and ZS35 is 52 and 89 respectively.
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements just by looking at specs. The graphic underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the P900 and ZS35.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same MP so you should expect similar quality of files but you will need to factor the production date of the products into consideration. The fresher P900 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Panasonic |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix P900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2015-03-02 | 2014-01-06 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 921k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p) 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 899 gr (1.98 lb) | 305 gr (0.67 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 103 x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL23 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $600 | $300 |