Nikon P900 vs Samsung HZ50W
52 Imaging
40 Features
63 Overall
49
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Nikon P900 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 899g - 140 x 103 x 137mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Replacement is Nikon P1000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Released May 2010
- Alternative Name is WB5500
Photography Glossary Nikon P900 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Nikon P900 versus Samsung HZ50W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Nikon and Samsung. The image resolution of the P900 (16MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe P900 was manufactured 4 years after the HZ50W which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the P900 scores versus the HZ50W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon P900 vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix P900 and Samsung HZ50W. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon P900 Gallery and Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P900 over the Samsung HZ50W
| P900 | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2015 |  | May 2010 | Newer by 59 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Nikon P900
| HZ50W | P900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon P900 and Samsung HZ50W
| P900 | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Nikon P900 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Nikon P900 offers physical dimensions of 140mm x 103mm x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") and a weight of 899 grams (1.98 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ50W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon P900 versus Samsung HZ50W in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the P900 compared to the HZ50W.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the P900 and HZ50W is 52 and 70 respectively.
Nikon P900 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions only by going through a spec sheet. The picture here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the P900 and HZ50W.
Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Nikon P900 to provide more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger P900 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon P900 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon P900 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P900 | Samsung HZ50W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P900 | Samsung HZ50W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB5500 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2015-03-02 | 2010-05-03 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 921 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.60 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p) 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Yes | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 899g (1.98 lb) | 426g (0.94 lb) |
| Dimensions | 140 x 103 x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL23 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $600 | $250 |