Nikon P900 vs Sony H400
Portability
52 Imaging
40 Features
63 Overall
49
52 Imaging
40 Features
63 Overall
49
Portability
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Nikon P900 vs Sony H400 Key Specs
Nikon P900
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 899g - 140 x 103 x 137mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Updated by Nikon P1000
Sony H400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Announced February 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon P900 vs Sony H400 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Nikon P900 and Sony H400, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Nikon and Sony. The sensor resolution of the P900 (16MP) and the H400 (20MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe P900 was launched 13 months after the H400 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the P900 grades against the H400 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon P900 vs Sony H400 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix P900 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon P900 Gallery & Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P900 over the Sony H400
| P900 | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2015 |  | February 2014 | Newer by 13 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Nikon P900
| H400 | P900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon P900 and Sony H400
| P900 | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Nikon P900 vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Nikon P900 has outer dimensions of 140mm x 103mm x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") having a weight of 899 grams (1.98 lbs) and the Sony H400 has measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") and a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon P900 and Sony H400 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the P900 and the H400.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the P900 and H400 is 52 and 62 respectively.
Nikon P900 vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specifications. The image underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the P900 and H400.
To sum up, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can expect the Sony H400 to give you greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent P900 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon P900 vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Nikon P900
Portrait photography with Sony H400
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has face detection focusing
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
MP count decent (20MP)
features face detection focusing
no manual focus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Nikon P900 Street photography highlights
Sony H400 Street photography highlights
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
heavier than competitors in class (899g)
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (628g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Nikon P900 Sports photography factors
Sony H400 Sports photography factors
long zoom range (24-2000mm 83.3 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
good battery (360 per charge)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (25-1550mm 62.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
max fps low (1.0 frames per second)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Nikon P900 as a Travel photography camera
Sony H400 as a Travel photography camera
good battery (360 CIPA)
has bluetooth
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
pretty wide (24mm)
very long reach (2000mm)
heavier than competitors in class (899g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
long zoom (1550mm)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (628 grams)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Nikon P900 Landscape photography information
Sony H400 Landscape photography information
focusing manually
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
good battery (360 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
really wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Nikon P900 Vlogging highlights
Sony H400 Vlogging highlights
pretty wide (24mm)
selfie friendly screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no external mic socket
heavier than competitors in class (899g)
really wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focusing
does have external microphone port
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
more heavy than competition in class (628 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon P900 vs Sony H400 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Sony |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2015-03-02 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed C2 | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.4-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 921 thousand dot | 201 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 8.80 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p) 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 X 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Yes | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 899 gr (1.98 lb) | 628 gr (1.38 lb) |
| Dimensions | 140 x 103 x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL23 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $600 | $268 |