Nikon P950 vs Olympus VR-330
52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Nikon P950 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
- Introduced January 2020
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus VR-320
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon P950 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Nikon P950 versus Olympus VR-330, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the P950 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is relatively close and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe P950 was launched 9 years after the VR-330 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Nikon P950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the P950 scores vs the VR-330 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon P950 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P950 and Olympus VR-330. The complete galleries are available at Nikon P950 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P950 over the Olympus VR-330
| P950 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2020 |  | February 2011 | Newer by 109 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimension | 3.2" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Nikon P950
| VR-330 | P950 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon P950 and Olympus VR-330
| P950 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Nikon P950 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon P950 features outer dimensions of 140mm x 110mm x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") accompanied by a weight of 1005 grams (2.22 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Nikon P950 versus Olympus VR-330 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the P950 versus the VR-330.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the P950 and VR-330 is 52 and 94 respectively.
Nikon P950 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specs. The pic below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the P950 and VR-330.
All in all, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should count on the Nikon P950 to provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The newer P950 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon P950 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon P950 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P950 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P950 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2020-01-07 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 921k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,359k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 90 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 300s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 1005 gr (2.22 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $797 | $220 |