Nikon P950 vs Samsung WB800F
52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Nikon P950 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
- Introduced January 2020
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon P950 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below, we are matching up the Nikon P950 vs Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Nikon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the P950 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is very comparable and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe P950 was announced 7 years later than the WB800F and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Nikon P950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the P950 matches up vs the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon P950 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix P950 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon P950 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P950 over the Samsung WB800F
| P950 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2020 |  | January 2013 | Fresher by 86 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimension | 3.2" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Nikon P950
| WB800F | P950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon P950 and Samsung WB800F
| P950 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus |
Nikon P950 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon P950 has outer dimensions of 140mm x 110mm x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") along with a weight of 1005 grams (2.22 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Look at the Nikon P950 vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the P950 compared to the WB800F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the P950 and WB800F is 52 and 92 respectively.
Nikon P950 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing purely by going through technical specs. The graphic underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the P950 and WB800F.
As you have seen, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of images but you might want to take the age of the cameras into account. The newer P950 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Nikon P950 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon P950 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P950 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P950 | Samsung WB800F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2020-01-07 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 921k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,359k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 90 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 300 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 1005 gr (2.22 pounds) | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $797 | $300 |