Nikon S02 vs Samsung SL620
97 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
![Nikon Coolpix S02 front Nikon Coolpix S02 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S02/Nikon-S02-front.jpg)
![Samsung SL620 front Samsung SL620 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-SL620/Samsung-SL620-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Nikon S02 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 100g - 77 x 51 x 18mm
- Announced September 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL65
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S02 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Nikon S02 versus Samsung SL620, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Nikon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S02 (13MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is fairly close but the S02 (1/3") and SL620 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The S02 was manufactured 4 years later than the SL620 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the S02 grades versus the SL620 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S02 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S02 & Samsung SL620. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S02 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S02 over the Samsung SL620
S02 | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2013 | ![]() | February 2009 | Fresher by 56 months |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Nikon S02
SL620 | S02 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S02 and Samsung SL620
S02 | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Nikon S02 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Nikon S02 provides outside measurements of 77mm x 51mm x 18mm (3.0" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Nikon S02 versus Samsung SL620 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the S02 vs the SL620.
![Nikon S02 vs Samsung SL620 size comparison Nikon S02 vs Samsung SL620 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S02-vs-Samsung-SL620-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the S02 and SL620 is 97 and 94 respectively.
![Nikon S02 vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison Nikon S02 vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S02-vs-Samsung-SL620-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S02 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing a spec sheet. The visual here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the S02 and SL620.
As you can see, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The S02 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more difficult and the Nikon S02 will render more detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The newer S02 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
![Nikon S02 vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison Nikon S02 vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S02-vs-Samsung-SL620-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S02 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S02 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S02 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S02-vs-Samsung-SL620-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S02 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S02 | Samsung SL620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Samsung |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S02 | Samsung SL620 |
Alternative name | - | PL65 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2013-09-05 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 17.3mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 7.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | - | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 1.40 m | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps); High-speed: 1920 x 1080 (15 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 100g (0.22 pounds) | 168g (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 77 x 51 x 18mm (3.0" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Built-in | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | - | One |
Launch pricing | $177 | $200 |