Nikon S02 vs Sony TX1
97 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
![Nikon Coolpix S02 front Nikon Coolpix S02 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S02/Nikon-S02-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX1/Sony-TX1-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Nikon S02 vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 100g - 77 x 51 x 18mm
- Introduced September 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced August 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S02 vs Sony TX1 Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Nikon S02 vs Sony TX1, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the S02 (13MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the S02 (1/3") and TX1 (1/2.4") offer different sensor sizes.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The S02 was introduced 4 years after the TX1 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the S02 scores vs the TX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S02 vs Sony TX1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S02 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S02 Gallery & Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S02 over the Sony TX1
S02 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2013 | ![]() | August 2009 | Newer by 50 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Nikon S02
TX1 | S02 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Nikon S02 and Sony TX1
S02 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Nikon S02 vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon S02 comes with physical measurements of 77mm x 51mm x 18mm (3.0" x 2.0" x 0.7") along with a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) while the Sony TX1 has sizing of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Look at the Nikon S02 vs Sony TX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the S02 against the TX1.
![Nikon S02 vs Sony TX1 size comparison Nikon S02 vs Sony TX1 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S02-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX1-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S02 and TX1 is 97 and 96 respectively.
![Nikon S02 vs Sony TX1 top view buttons comparison Nikon S02 vs Sony TX1 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S02-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX1-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S02 vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching a spec sheet. The image below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the S02 and TX1.
As you can see, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The S02 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Nikon S02 will provide you with greater detail using its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer S02 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
![Nikon S02 vs Sony TX1 sensor size comparison Nikon S02 vs Sony TX1 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S02-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX1-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S02 vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S02 vs Sony TX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S02 vs Sony TX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S02-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX1-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S02 vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S02 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Sony |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S02 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-09-05 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 17.3mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 8cm |
Crop factor | 7.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | - | 2 seconds |
Max shutter speed | - | 1/1250 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 1.40 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps); High-speed: 1920 x 1080 (15 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 100 grams (0.22 lbs) | 142 grams (0.31 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 77 x 51 x 18mm (3.0" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Built-in | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | - | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | - | Single |
Price at release | $177 | $350 |