Nikon S02 vs Sony W320
97 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
![Nikon Coolpix S02 front Nikon Coolpix S02 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S02/Nikon-S02-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W320/Sony-W320-front.jpg)
97 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Nikon S02 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 100g - 77 x 51 x 18mm
- Announced September 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S02 vs Sony W320 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Nikon S02 vs Sony W320, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Sony. The resolution of the S02 (13MP) and the W320 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the S02 (1/3") and W320 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The S02 was revealed 3 years later than the W320 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the S02 matches up versus the W320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S02 vs Sony W320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S02 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The full galleries are available at Nikon S02 Gallery and Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S02 over the Sony W320
S02 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 45 months |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Nikon S02
W320 | S02 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S02 and Sony W320
S02 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Nikon S02 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Nikon S02 offers outer measurements of 77mm x 51mm x 18mm (3.0" x 2.0" x 0.7") along with a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) while the Sony W320 has proportions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S02 vs Sony W320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the S02 vs the W320.
![Nikon S02 vs Sony W320 size comparison Nikon S02 vs Sony W320 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S02-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W320-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S02 and W320 is 97 and 97 respectively.
![Nikon S02 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison Nikon S02 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S02-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W320-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S02 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements only by checking out specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the S02 and W320.
All in all, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The S02 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony W320 will provide more detail because of its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The younger S02 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
![Nikon S02 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison Nikon S02 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S02-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W320-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S02 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S02 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S02 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S02-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W320-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S02 vs Sony W320 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S02 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Sony |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S02 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2013-09-05 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 17.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 4cm |
Crop factor | 7.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 1.40 m | 4.80 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps); High-speed: 1920 x 1080 (15 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 100 grams (0.22 pounds) | 117 grams (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 77 x 51 x 18mm (3.0" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Built-in | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | - | One |
Pricing at release | $177 | $269 |