Nikon S220 vs Olympus TG-870
97 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Nikon S220 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2000
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 100g - 90 x 56 x 18mm
- Announced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Old Model is Olympus TG-860
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S220 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Nikon S220 vs Olympus TG-870, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the S220 (10MP) and TG-870 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S220 was unveiled 8 years earlier than the TG-870 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the S220 scores against the TG-870 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S220 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S220 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon S220 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S220 over the Olympus TG-870
| S220 | TG-870 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Nikon S220
| TG-870 | S220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2016 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 84 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S220 and Olympus TG-870
| S220 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Nikon S220 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Nikon S220 offers physical measurements of 90mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has specifications of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Nikon S220 vs Olympus TG-870 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the S220 and the TG-870.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S220 and TG-870 is 97 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S220 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at specs. The image below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the S220 and TG-870.
All in all, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-870 to give you greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged S220 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon S220 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon S220 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S220 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S220 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2009-02-03 | 2016-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 2000 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 100 gr (0.22 lbs) | 221 gr (0.49 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 56 x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL10 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $56 | $280 |