Clicky

Nikon S220 vs Samsung ST95

Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24
Nikon Coolpix S220 front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
19
Overall
31

Nikon S220 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Nikon S220
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 2000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 100g - 90 x 56 x 18mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Nikon S220 vs Samsung ST95 Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Nikon S220 and Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Nikon and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the S220 (10MP) and ST95 (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The S220 was revealed 23 months prior to the ST95 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a short highlight of how the S220 matches up vs the ST95 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon S220 over the Samsung ST95

 S220 ST95 

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Nikon S220

 ST95 S220 
RevealedJanuary 2011February 2009Fresher by 23 months
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Nikon S220 and Samsung ST95

 S220 ST95 
Manually focus No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

Nikon S220 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Nikon S220 offers external measurements of 90mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Compare the Nikon S220 and Samsung ST95 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the S220 vs the ST95.

Nikon S220 vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S220 and ST95 is 97 and 99 respectively.

Nikon S220 vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S220 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing merely by researching specs. The visual here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the S220 and ST95.

All in all, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung ST95 to provide you with greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older S220 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Nikon S220 vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Nikon S220 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S220 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon S220 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung ST95 Portrait photography highlights
19
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
30
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Nikon S220 Street photography advice
Samsung ST95 Street photography advice
48
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
50
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
low max ISO (0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Nikon S220 Sports photography information
Samsung ST95 Sports photography information
16
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
27
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Nikon S220
Travel photography with Samsung ST95
52
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
71
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
very good maximum aperture (f)
does not have Timelapse function
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Nikon S220 Landscape photography information
Samsung ST95 Landscape photography information
22
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.5 inch)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
38
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
does not have RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S220 Vlogging information
Samsung ST95 Vlogging information
22
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing mic jack
27
very good maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone port
Photography Glossary

Nikon S220 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S220 and Samsung ST95
 Nikon Coolpix S220Samsung ST95
General Information
Brand Nikon Samsung
Model Nikon Coolpix S220 Samsung ST95
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-02-03 2011-01-19
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 2000 -
Lowest native ISO 80 -
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) ()
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.9 -
Macro focus range 10cm -
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 11.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash settings Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 100g (0.22 lbs) -
Dimensions 90 x 56 x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model EN-EL10 -
Self timer Yes (3 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal -
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $56 $145