Nikon S230 vs Olympus TG-870
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Nikon S230 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2000
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 115g - 91 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-860
Nikon S230 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Nikon S230 and Olympus TG-870, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the S230 (10MP) and TG-870 (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S230 was revealed 8 years earlier than the TG-870 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short overview of how the S230 grades versus the TG-870 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon S230 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S230 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S230 Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S230 over the Olympus TG-870
S230 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Nikon S230
TG-870 | S230 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2016 | February 2009 | More recent by 84 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S230 and Olympus TG-870
S230 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Nikon S230 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon S230 provides physical measurements of 91mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has specifications of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Nikon S230 and Olympus TG-870 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the S230 against the TG-870.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S230 and TG-870 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S230 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at specs. The graphic below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S230 and TG-870.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-870 to give you greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots much more aggressively. The older S230 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Nikon S230 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S230 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S230 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S230 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-02-03 | 2016-01-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 2000 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 115g (0.25 pounds) | 221g (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 91 x 57 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL10 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $150 | $280 |