Nikon S230 vs Olympus VG-110
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
![Nikon Coolpix S230 front Nikon Coolpix S230 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S230/Nikon-S230-front.jpg)
![Olympus VG-110 front Olympus VG-110 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VG-110/Olympus-VG-110-front.jpg)
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Nikon S230 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2000
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 115g - 91 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Released February 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S230 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Here is a in depth comparison of the Nikon S230 vs Olympus VG-110, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S230 (10MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The S230 was launched 24 months prior to the VG-110 making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the S230 matches up versus the VG-110 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S230 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S230 and Olympus VG-110. The complete galleries are available at Nikon S230 Gallery and Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S230 over the Olympus VG-110
S230 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Nikon S230
VG-110 | S230 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | ![]() | February 2009 | Fresher by 24 months |
Common features in the Nikon S230 and Olympus VG-110
S230 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Nikon S230 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Nikon S230 offers external dimensions of 91mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-110 has sizing of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Look at the Nikon S230 vs Olympus VG-110 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the S230 compared to the VG-110.
![Nikon S230 vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison Nikon S230 vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S230-vs-Olympus-VG-110-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the S230 and VG-110 is 96 and 97 respectively.
![Nikon S230 vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison Nikon S230 vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S230-vs-Olympus-VG-110-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S230 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing simply by checking out technical specs. The graphic here may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S230 and VG-110.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Olympus VG-110 to produce greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics more aggressively. The older S230 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
![Nikon S230 vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison Nikon S230 vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S230-vs-Olympus-VG-110-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S230 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S230 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S230 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S230-vs-Olympus-VG-110-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S230 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S230 | Olympus VG-110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S230 | Olympus VG-110 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-02-03 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 2000 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 11.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 115 gr (0.25 pounds) | 105 gr (0.23 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 91 x 57 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 170 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL10 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $150 | $150 |