Nikon S230 vs Samsung CL80
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
95 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
Nikon S230 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2000
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 115g - 91 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5500
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S230 vs Samsung CL80 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Nikon S230 versus Samsung CL80, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Nikon and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the S230 (10MP) and CL80 (14MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S230 was brought out 11 months earlier than the CL80 so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summary of how the S230 scores vs the CL80 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S230 vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S230 & Samsung CL80. The entire galleries are available at Nikon S230 Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S230 over the Samsung CL80
| S230 | CL80 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Nikon S230
| CL80 | S230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 11 months |
| Display sizing | 3.7" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") |
Common features in the Nikon S230 and Samsung CL80
| S230 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Nikon S230 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Nikon S230 provides physical measurements of 91mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL80 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S230 versus Samsung CL80 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the S230 versus the CL80.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S230 and CL80 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Nikon S230 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the S230 and CL80.
As you can tell, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung CL80 to deliver greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older S230 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Nikon S230 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon S230 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S230 | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S230 | Samsung CL80 |
| Also Known as | - | ST5500 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-02-03 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 2000 | 4800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 115 gr (0.25 pounds) | 160 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 91 x 57 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | EN-EL10 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $150 | $400 |
