Nikon S31 vs Samsung PL200
90 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
94 Imaging
36 Features
22 Overall
30
Nikon S31 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.9" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 29-87mm (F) lens
- 185g - 105 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed July 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S31 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Nikon S31 vs Samsung PL200, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Nikon and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the S31 (10MP) and PL200 (14MP) and the S31 (1/2.9") and PL200 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S31 was manufactured 2 years after the PL200 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the S31 matches up against the PL200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Nikon S31 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S31 and Samsung PL200. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S31 Gallery and Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S31 over the Samsung PL200
| S31 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 | July 2010 | Newer by 36 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Nikon S31
| PL200 | S31 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Nikon S31 and Samsung PL200
| S31 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S31 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Nikon S31 provides physical dimensions of 105mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.1" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL200 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Nikon S31 vs Samsung PL200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the S31 and the PL200.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the S31 and PL200 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S31 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions merely by looking at a spec sheet. The pic below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the S31 and PL200.
As you can see, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The S31 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung PL200 will give extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher S31 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon S31 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon S31 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S31 | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S31 | Samsung PL200 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-06-21 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.9" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 4.96 x 3.72mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 18.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 29-87mm (3.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 7.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 185 grams (0.41 lb) | 170 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 65 x 42mm (4.1" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | BP70A |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $90 | $0 |