Nikon S32 vs Nikon S6100
90 Imaging
36 Features
23 Overall
30
![Nikon Coolpix S32 front Nikon Coolpix S32 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S32/Nikon-S32-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix S6100 front Nikon Coolpix S6100 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S6100/Nikon-S6100-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
39 Features
39 Overall
39
Nikon S32 vs Nikon S6100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 175g - 108 x 66 x 40mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-196mm (F3.7-5.6) lens
- 175g - 98 x 58 x 27mm
- Revealed February 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S32 vs Nikon S6100 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Nikon S32 vs Nikon S6100, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both built by Nikon. The image resolution of the S32 (13MP) and the S6100 (16MP) is very comparable but the S32 (1/3") and S6100 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The S32 was manufactured 3 years after the S6100 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the S32 matches up vs the S6100 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S32 vs Nikon S6100 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S32 and Nikon Coolpix S6100. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon S32 Gallery and Nikon S6100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S32 over the Nikon S6100
S32 | S6100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | ![]() | February 2011 | Newer by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Nikon S6100 over the Nikon S32
S6100 | S32 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S32 and Nikon S6100
S32 | S6100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Nikon S32 vs Nikon S6100 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Nikon S32 features physical measurements of 108mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Nikon S6100 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S32 vs Nikon S6100 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the S32 and the S6100.
![Nikon S32 vs Nikon S6100 size comparison Nikon S32 vs Nikon S6100 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S32-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6100-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the S32 and S6100 is 90 and 93 respectively.
![Nikon S32 vs Nikon S6100 top view buttons comparison Nikon S32 vs Nikon S6100 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S32-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6100-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S32 vs Nikon S6100 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions only by checking out specifications. The pic underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the S32 and S6100.
To sum up, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The S32 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Nikon S6100 will show greater detail due to its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger S32 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
![Nikon S32 vs Nikon S6100 sensor size comparison Nikon S32 vs Nikon S6100 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S32-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6100-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S32 vs Nikon S6100 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S32 vs Nikon S6100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S32 vs Nikon S6100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S32-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6100-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S32 vs Nikon S6100 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S32 | Nikon Coolpix S6100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Nikon |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S32 | Nikon Coolpix S6100 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-02-07 | 2011-02-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 17.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.7-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 7.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | TFT touchscreen LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920x1080 (30p), VGA 640x480 (30p, 15p) | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lb) | 175 gr (0.39 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 66 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 98 x 58 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 210 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (Approx. 10 seconds ) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $180 | $195 |