Nikon S32 vs Nikon S9900
90 Imaging
36 Features
23 Overall
30
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Nikon S32 vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 175g - 108 x 66 x 40mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Succeeded the Nikon S9700
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S32 vs Nikon S9900 Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Nikon S32 vs Nikon S9900, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Nikon. The image resolution of the S32 (13MP) and the S9900 (16MP) is relatively comparable but the S32 (1/3") and S9900 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S32 was released 12 months prior to the S9900 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the S32 grades versus the S9900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S32 vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S32 & Nikon Coolpix S9900. The complete galleries are available at Nikon S32 Gallery & Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S32 over the Nikon S9900
| S32 | S9900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Nikon S32
| S9900 | S32 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 |  | February 2014 | More modern by 12 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Nikon S32 and Nikon S9900
| S32 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S32 vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Nikon S32 enjoys physical measurements of 108mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Nikon S9900 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S32 vs Nikon S9900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the S32 and the S9900.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the S32 and S9900 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Nikon S32 vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The pic here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the S32 and S9900.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The S32 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Nikon S9900 will produce extra detail as a result of its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged S32 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon S32 vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon S32 vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S32 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Nikon |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S32 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-02-07 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 17.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.7-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 7.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920x1080 (30p), VGA 640x480 (30p, 15p) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lbs) | 289 grams (0.64 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 66 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (Approx. 10 seconds ) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $180 | $300 |