Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-310
90 Imaging
35 Features
23 Overall
30
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 175g - 108 x 66 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Nikon S32 and Olympus TG-310, both Waterproof cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S32 (13MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the S32 (1/3") and TG-310 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S32 was revealed 3 years later than the TG-310 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the S32 grades vs the TG-310 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S32 & Olympus TG-310. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S32 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S32 over the Olympus TG-310
| S32 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | January 2011 | Fresher by 38 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Nikon S32
| TG-310 | S32 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S32 and Olympus TG-310
| S32 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal display dimensions | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S32 features outside measurements of 108mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Nikon S32 and Olympus TG-310 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the S32 vs the TG-310.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the S32 and TG-310 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing specifications. The graphic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the S32 and TG-310.
To sum up, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The S32 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus TG-310 will produce extra detail because of its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern S32 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S32 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S32 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2014-02-07 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 17.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Maximum resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 7.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920x1080 (30p), VGA 640x480 (30p, 15p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 pounds) | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 66 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | 150 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (Approx. 10 seconds ) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $180 | $0 |