Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
90 Imaging
36 Features
23 Overall
30


92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 175g - 108 x 66 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012

Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Here, we are comparing the Nikon S32 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, both Waterproof digital cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S32 (13MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is fairly similar but the S32 (1/3") and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.

The S32 was introduced 2 years later than the TG-820 iHS and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a short overview of how the S32 matches up against the TG-820 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S32 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S32 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S32 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
S32 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | February 2012 | More recent by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Nikon S32
TG-820 iHS | S32 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S32 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
S32 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon S32 features outside measurements of 108mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Nikon S32 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the S32 vs the TG-820 iHS.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S32 and TG-820 iHS is 90 and 92 respectively.

Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to see the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading a spec sheet. The graphic here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the S32 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can see, the 2 cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The S32 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Nikon S32 will offer you extra detail using its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The fresher S32 will have a benefit in sensor tech.

Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S32 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S32 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2014-02-07 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 17.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Highest resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 7.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,030k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920x1080 (30p), VGA 640x480 (30p, 15p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 66 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | 220 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (Approx. 10 seconds ) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $180 | $500 |