Nikon S32 vs Olympus VR-340
90 Imaging
36 Features
23 Overall
30
96 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Nikon S32 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 175g - 108 x 66 x 40mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S32 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Nikon S32 versus Olympus VR-340, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the S32 (13MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is pretty similar but the S32 (1/3") and VR-340 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S32 was introduced 2 years later than the VR-340 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the S32 scores versus the VR-340 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S32 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S32 & Olympus VR-340. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S32 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S32 over the Olympus VR-340
| S32 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | January 2012 | More recent by 26 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Nikon S32
| VR-340 | S32 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S32 and Olympus VR-340
| S32 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S32 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S32 offers exterior dimensions of 108mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Nikon S32 versus Olympus VR-340 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the S32 compared to the VR-340.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the S32 and VR-340 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Nikon S32 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the S32 and VR-340.
As you can see, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The S32 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus VR-340 will offer extra detail using its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent S32 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon S32 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon S32 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S32 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S32 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-02-07 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 17.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 7.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920x1080 (30p), VGA 640x480 (30p, 15p) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lb) | 125 gr (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 66 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (Approx. 10 seconds ) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $180 | $130 |