Nikon S32 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
90 Imaging
36 Features
23 Overall
30
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Nikon S32 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 175g - 108 x 66 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S32 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Nikon S32 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the S32 (13MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is pretty close but the S32 (1/3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") boast different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S32 was announced 14 months after the XZ-2 iHS which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short overview of how the S32 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Nikon S32 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S32 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S32 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S32 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| S32 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | December 2012 | Newer by 14 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Nikon S32
| XZ-2 iHS | S32 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S32 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| S32 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Nikon S32 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S32 enjoys external dimensions of 108mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Nikon S32 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the S32 vs the XZ-2 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the S32 and XZ-2 iHS is 90 and 85 respectively.
Nikon S32 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by researching technical specs. The image here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the S32 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The S32 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Nikon S32 will render greater detail with its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher S32 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Nikon S32 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon S32 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S32 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S32 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-02-07 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 17.3mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 7.5 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920x1080 (30p), VGA 640x480 (30p, 15p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lb) | 346 gr (0.76 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 66 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | 340 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (Approx. 10 seconds ) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $180 | $450 |