Nikon S32 vs Ricoh WG-M1
90 Imaging
36 Features
23 Overall
30
![Nikon Coolpix S32 front Nikon Coolpix S32 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S32/Nikon-S32-front.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-M1 front Ricoh WG-M1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-M1/Ricoh-WG-M1-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Nikon S32 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 175g - 108 x 66 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S32 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Nikon S32 vs Ricoh WG-M1, both Waterproof digital cameras by rivals Nikon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the S32 (13MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly similar but the S32 (1/3") and WG-M1 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The S32 was announced 7 months prior to the WG-M1 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the S32 matches up against the WG-M1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S32 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S32 and Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S32 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S32 over the Ricoh WG-M1
S32 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Nikon S32
WG-M1 | S32 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2014 | ![]() | February 2014 | More recent by 7 months |
Common features in the Nikon S32 and Ricoh WG-M1
S32 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Nikon S32 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Nikon S32 has outer dimensions of 108mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S32 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the S32 vs the WG-M1.
![Nikon S32 vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison Nikon S32 vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S32-vs-Ricoh-WG-M1-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S32 and WG-M1 is 90 and 91 respectively.
![Nikon S32 vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison Nikon S32 vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S32-vs-Ricoh-WG-M1-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S32 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over a spec sheet. The photograph below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the S32 and WG-M1.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The S32 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Ricoh WG-M1 will deliver greater detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics much more aggressively. The older S32 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Nikon S32 vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison Nikon S32 vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S32-vs-Ricoh-WG-M1-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S32 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S32 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S32 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S32-vs-Ricoh-WG-M1-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S32 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S32 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Ricoh |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S32 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2014-02-07 | 2014-09-12 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 17.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | (1×) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 7.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 1.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 115k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920x1080 (30p), VGA 640x480 (30p, 15p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 175 gr (0.39 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 66 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | 350 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL19 | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (Approx. 10 seconds ) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $180 | $2,000 |