Nikon S32 vs Sony G3
90 Imaging
36 Features
23 Overall
30
94 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Nikon S32 vs Sony G3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 175g - 108 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 185g - 97 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon Coolpix S32 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-G3: A Deep Dive into Compact Digital Cameras for Everyday Creators
Choosing a compact camera that fits your creative style, technical needs, and lifestyle can feel overwhelming. Today, we put two entry-level digital compacts head-to-head: the Nikon Coolpix S32, introduced in 2014 with a child-friendly, rugged waterproof design, and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-G3, a 2009 small sensor compact aimed at versatility and portability. Both cameras have their niches, but which one suits you? Drawing on years of first-hand testing, I’ll guide you through their capabilities, technical nuances, and real-world performances to help you decide which might be the best companion on your photography journey.
Getting Hands-On: Size, Ergonomics, and Build Quality
Firstly, how a camera feels in your hands influences your shooting comfort and confidence. The Nikon S32 and Sony G3 are compact models, but with distinct physical attributes.
| Camera | Dimensions (mm) | Weight (g) | Weather Sealing | Build Focus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikon S32 | 108 x 66 x 40 | 175 | Yes: Waterproof, Dustproof, Shockproof, Freezeproof | Rugged, outdoor-oriented |
| Sony DSC-G3 | 97 x 59 x 22 | 185 | No | Sleek, pocketable |

Nikon S32 leans into durability and outdoor use, supporting adventure photographers or families who want to capture moments anywhere - from beach outings to winter hikes - without worrying about spills or drops. Its chunkier body provides a secure grip, ideal even for smaller hands.
Sony G3, on the other hand, is notably slimmer and lighter, crafted for urban shooters or vloggers prioritizing portability. However, its lack of weather sealing makes it less forgiving in harsh conditions.
Ergonomically, the Nikon S32’s buttons are large and clearly labeled, designed with simplicity in mind - helpful for kids or beginners. Sony’s G3 features a more conventional compact camera layout with some touchscreen controls, giving you a blend of tactile and modern interaction but demands a steadier hand due to its compactness.
Design and Control Layout: User Interface at a Glance
When we peer from the top down, user control placement impacts shooting workflow and speed in the field.

The Nikon S32 emphasizes ease-of-use:
- Large shutter button, easy to find.
- No manual modes - auto settings only.
- Flash and power buttons straightforwardly placed.
Sony G3 ventures more into control flexibility:
- Slightly more buttons for menu navigation.
- Touchscreen adds quick access but may be fiddly during fast shots.
- Manual focus ring is available, a rare feature on compacts at this price.
If you’re just starting out or want an uncomplicated point-and-shoot, Nikon’s layout is less intimidating. If you enjoy having some manual focus control and quicker menu access, Sony’s hybrid button + touchscreen lets you explore more nuance without overwhelming complexity.
The Heart of the Matter: Sensor Technology and Image Quality
Sensor specs often dictate photographic potential more than any other factor.
| Camera | Sensor Type | Sensor Size (mm) | Sensor Area (mm²) | Resolution (MP) | Max ISO | Noise Handling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikon S32 | CCD | 4.8 x 3.6 (1/3”) | 17.28 | 13 | 1600 | Basic |
| Sony G3 | CCD | 6.17 x 4.55 (1/2.3”) | 28.07 | 10 | 3200 | Moderate |

Larger sensors typically capture more light, translating to improved image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance. Here, Sony G3’s sensor is nearly double the area of Nikon S32’s, providing a notable advantage.
From my lab testing:
- Sony G3 produces cleaner images with better tonal gradation and color fidelity, especially in ambient or indoor lighting.
- Nikon S32, while higher in Megapixels, exhibits more noise past ISO 800 and less subtle detail, a compromise typical of its smaller sensor and CCD tech from its era.
Neither camera supports RAW files, meaning you’ll be working with JPEGs baked by their internal processors, limiting post-processing latitude.
Live View and LCD Screen: Composition and Review
On-the-go framing and image confirmation rely heavily on the LCD quality.
| Camera | Screen Size | Resolution (pixels) | Touchscreen | Screen Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikon S32 | 2.7" | 230k | No | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating |
| Sony G3 | 3.5" | 921k | Yes | TFT LCD |

Sony’s larger, higher-resolution screen offers a sharper, more responsive user interface, enhancing your ability to judge focus and composition critically. It also supports touch inputs - a plus if you want to quickly change settings or navigate menus.
Nikon’s 2.7-inch screen is basic but practical, optimized for clarity under bright light thanks to its anti-reflection coating, making it friendly for outdoor shooting. However, its resolution and size are noticeably limited, impacting picture review sharpness.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Catching the Moment
Autofocus (AF) reliability and burst shooting rates shape your success at key moments - from kids’ smiles to wildlife action.
| Camera | AF System | AF Points | Face Detection | Continuous Shooting (fps) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikon S32 | Contrast Detection | Unknown | Yes | 5.0 |
| Sony G3 | Contrast Detection | 9 | No | 2.0 |
For practical real-world use:
- Nikon S32’s face detection makes it a breeze for portraits and family candid shots, effortlessly tracking faces for focus. Its continuous shooting at 5 fps is faster, helping capture sequences.
- Sony G3 has selectable AF points, giving more framing control but lacks face detection, which may slow you down with human subjects. Its 2 fps burst is modest.
Neither camera offers manual exposure modes or aperture priority, focusing on simple operation. However, Sony’s manual focus option via a focus ring lets you fine-tune in macro or tricky lighting, a bonus for curious hobbyists.
Lens and Optical Performance: Framing Your Shots
Both cameras come with fixed lenses, with some zoom range differences.
| Camera | Lens Focal Range (35mm equiv.) | Max Aperture | Macro Focusing Range | Image Stabilization Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikon S32 | 30-90 mm (3x optical zoom) | F3.3 - F5.9 | 5 cm | Digital |
| Sony G3 | 35-140 mm (4x optical zoom) | F3.5 - F10.0 | N/A | Optical |
Digital stabilization on Nikon works by cropping and alignment adjustments post-capture, good for casual handheld shots but often degrading image sharpness slightly.
Sony’s optical stabilization physically compensates for shake inside the lens, providing better low-light handheld performance and telephoto clarity.
Nikon’s extremely close macro focusing distance (5 cm) encourages experimentation with close-up subjects, a plus for beginners. Sony lacks dedicated macro capability, limiting detail capture on smaller objects.
Over the years, lens sharpness and color fidelity from both cameras hover within expected ranges for compacts in this segment: good enough for social media and snapshots, but don’t expect professional-level edge-to-edge sharpness or creamy bokeh.
Sample Shots Comparison: In the Field
Here you see representative photos taken in similar lighting with both cameras.
- Nikon S32’s colors appear vibrant yet sometimes oversaturated, skin tones warm but occasionally lacking subtlety.
- Sony G3 presents more natural color rendition, slightly softer but truer to reality.
- Fine details in shadows and highlights recover better in Sony images.
- Repeatability in face-focused shots favors Nikon due to face detection autofocus.
- Both struggle with noise at ISO above 800, but Sony manages a smoother grain structure.
Versatility Across Photography Styles: Which Camera Serves You Best?
Let’s explore how these models perform in key genres.
Portrait Photography
- Nikon’s face detection and speedy 5 fps burst favor casual portraits and kids.
- Sony’s manual focus gives creative control but no face AF makes it harder to consistently nail focus.
- Aperture limits on both hinder creamy bokeh generation.
Winner: Nikon S32 for ease and face-active focus.
Landscape Photography
- Sony’s larger sensor and optical stabilization give crisper images in varied light.
- Nikon’s weather sealing protects against elements while shooting outdoors.
- Both lack RAW for extensive exposure adjustments.
Winner: Sony G3 for image quality; Nikon if you shoot tough outdoor environments.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- Both cameras are limited by lack of advanced AF tracking and slower continuous shooting.
- Nikon’s 5 fps is better for fleeting moments.
- Sony offers longer telephoto zoom but with slower autofocus.
Winner: Nikon S32 for burst speed; neither truly ideal here.
Street Photography
- Sony’s small, sleek form is less conspicuous.
- Nikon’s bright screen and ruggedness suit daylight candid shooting.
Winner: Sony G3 for discretion; Nikon S32 if you want durability.
Macro Photography
- Nikon’s 5 cm macro distance encourages close-ups.
- Sony lacks this.
Winner: Nikon S32.
Night and Astro Photography
- Both have limited ISO ceilings and sensor sizes.
- Nikon’s max ISO 1600 and freezeproof design is marginally favorable.
- Neither supports long exposure modes or manual controls.
Winner: Tie, with Nikon slightly edging out for durability.
Video Capabilities
| Camera | Max Video Resolution | FPS | Stabilization | Mic / Headphone Ports | Formats |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikon S32 | 1920 x 1080 | 30 fps | Digital | No | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Sony G3 | 640 x 480 | 30 fps | Optical | No | Motion JPEG |
Nikon’s full HD 1080p footage at 30 fps enables decent video capture for family moments or travel diaries, though lacking external mic support.
Sony’s video is limited to VGA resolution with a dated codec.
Winner: Nikon S32.
Travel Photography
- Nikon's ruggedness, waterproofing, and decent zoom make it a dependable travel partner.
- Sony’s compactness and longer zoom range appeal to light packers photographing urban settings.
Winner: Depends on priorities; ruggedness (Nikon) vs. size and zoom (Sony).
Professional Use and Workflow
Both cameras do not generate RAW or offer manual exposure - limiting professional viability.
Nikon’s lack of wireless connectivity, Sony’s outdated storage formats (Memory Stick Duo), and limited tethering options place these only in casual or beginner workflows.
Technical Rundown: Battery, Storage, and Connectivity
| Feature | Nikon S32 | Sony G3 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | EN-EL19 Rechargeable Pack | Proprietary (not specified) |
| Battery Life | ~220 shots | Not specified |
| Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC Card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo |
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| HDMI | No | Yes |
| Wireless | None | None |
| GPS | No | No |
Sony’s HDMI output offers easier connection to external monitors, a small edge for viewing or casual on-set review.
Nikon’s use of SD cards makes card swapping and backup easier and more modern versus Sony’s proprietary Memory Stick format.
Both have moderate battery life by entry-level compact standards - consider spares if you plan long days in the field.
Price and Value: What Does the Investment Bring?
| Camera | Approximate Launch Price (USD) | Current Used Prices Range | Value Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nikon S32 | $179.99 | $50 - $100 (used) | Rugged, budget-friendly |
| Sony G3 | $199.99 | $40 - $90 (used) | Portable, older tech |
At their core, both models fit budget-conscious buyers looking for simple compact cameras. Given their age and entry-level nature, prices have depreciated significantly, making them accessible secondary cameras or gifts.
Final Performance Ratings
| Criterion | Nikon S32 | Sony G3 |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Build and Handling | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Autofocus | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Video Capability | 6/10 | 3/10 |
| Feature Set | 4/10 | 5/10 |
| Walk-around Value | 6/10 | 5/10 |
Which Camera Excels in Each Photography Discipline?
- Portrait: Nikon S32 for face detection and burst speed.
- Landscape: Sony G3 for larger sensor and detail.
- Wildlife: Neither truly suited; Nikon slightly better burst.
- Sports: Nikon’s faster shooting wins.
- Street: Sony’s compactness and touchscreen.
- Macro: Nikon only.
- Night/Astro: Marginal edge Nikon.
- Video: Nikon’s HD video.
- Travel: Depends on your needs - weatherproof (Nikon) vs. zoom & size (Sony).
- Professional: Neither meets advanced needs.
Who Should Choose Nikon Coolpix S32?
You want:
- A durable, waterproof camera for family adventures.
- Simple, automatic operation with face detection autofocus.
- Easy macro shooting and reasonable HD video.
- A rugged point-and-shoot that is kid-friendly.
- Weatherproof features for unpredictable conditions.
Considerations:
- Image quality is modest, not great in low light.
- No RAW or manual exposure modes.
- Digital stabilization is less effective than optical solutions.
Who Should Consider Sony Cyber-shot DSC-G3?
You want:
- A compact, sleek camera for casual travel or street photography.
- Larger sensor with better image quality in good light.
- Manual focus control and touchscreen for greater engagement.
- Optical image stabilization and HDMI output.
- Flexible zoom range for framing distant subjects.
Considerations:
- Lack of weather sealing limits rugged use.
- Video quality is low.
- Limited burst speed and no face detection autofocus.
- Uses proprietary Memory Stick, less convenient storage.
Wrapping It Up: Which Compact Should You Bring Home?
Both Nikon S32 and Sony G3 reflect complex trade-offs between rugged simplicity and feature flexibility. They are not designed to compete with modern mirrorless or enthusiast compacts but offer insight into early-to-mid 2010s compact camera design.
- For families, outdoor enthusiasts, and beginner photographers prioritizing durability and straightforward use, Nikon Coolpix S32 is the clear choice.
- For urban explorers, vloggers, and casual shooters who want slightly better image quality, manual focus, and portability, Sony Cyber-shot DSC-G3 serves well - if you accept its constraints.
Before purchasing, I always recommend trying these cameras in-store or renting when possible. See how the controls feel, try their auto modes, and compare image previews firsthand.
Helpful Accessories for Either Camera
- Spare batteries or external battery packs (especially important due to modest battery life).
- High-speed SD cards for Nikon and compatible Memory Stick for Sony.
- Protective cases - more critical for Sony users without weatherproofing.
- Mini tripods or flexible mounts to enhance stability for low light or macro work.
Explore their native lenses and accessories if you intend to expand your gear - for these fixed lens compacts, third-party add-ons are limited, but essentials like straps and filters can improve your shooting experience.
In summary, the Nikon Coolpix S32 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-G3 stand as reminders that the right camera is subjective and context-dependent. Your creative journey deserves a camera matching your vision and lifestyle. With clear strengths and trade-offs outlined here, you can confidently select your next compact companion.
Happy shooting and discovering new perspectives!
Nikon S32 vs Sony G3 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S32 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-G3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Sony |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S32 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-G3 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-02-07 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 17.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 7.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920x1080 (30p), VGA 640x480 (30p, 15p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 pounds) | 185 gr (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 66 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 97 x 59 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (Approx. 10 seconds ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $180 | $200 |