Nikon S33 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
91 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Nikon S33 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3.1" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 221g - 110 x 66 x 27mm
- Revealed February 2015
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S33 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Let's look more closely at the Nikon S33 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S33 (13MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar but the S33 (1/3.1") and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S33 was announced 20 months after the TG-2 iHS which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the S33 scores against the TG-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Nikon S33 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S33 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S33 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S33 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| S33 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2015 |  | June 2013 | More modern by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Nikon S33
| TG-2 iHS | S33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S33 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| S33 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Nikon S33 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon S33 comes with outside dimensions of 110mm x 66mm x 27mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon S33 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the S33 and the TG-2 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the S33 and TG-2 iHS is 91 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S33 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading specifications. The picture below might give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the S33 and TG-2 iHS.
To sum up, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The S33 using its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Nikon S33 will offer you more detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more modern S33 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon S33 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon S33 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S33 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S33 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2015-02-10 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 4.7 x 3.5mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 16.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 7.7 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.7 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p), 320 x 240 (30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 66 x 27mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | 350 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, smile timer) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $150 | $380 |
