Nikon S33 vs Olympus VG-160
91 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
![Nikon Coolpix S33 front Nikon Coolpix S33 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S33/Nikon-S33-front.jpg)
![Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VG-160/Olympus-VG-160-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Nikon S33 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3.1" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 221g - 110 x 66 x 27mm
- Revealed February 2015
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S33 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Nikon S33 vs Olympus VG-160, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the S33 (13MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is relatively well matched but the S33 (1/3.1") and VG-160 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The S33 was brought out 3 years later than the VG-160 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief summation of how the S33 grades against the VG-160 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S33 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S33 & Olympus VG-160. The entire galleries are available at Nikon S33 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S33 over the Olympus VG-160
S33 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 38 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Nikon S33
VG-160 | S33 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Nikon S33 and Olympus VG-160
S33 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S33 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Nikon S33 offers external measurements of 110mm x 66mm x 27mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S33 vs Olympus VG-160 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the S33 versus the VG-160.
![Nikon S33 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison Nikon S33 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S33-vs-Olympus-VG-160-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S33 and VG-160 is 91 and 96 respectively.
![Nikon S33 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison Nikon S33 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S33-vs-Olympus-VG-160-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S33 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking a spec sheet. The graphic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the S33 and VG-160.
As you can see, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The S33 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Olympus VG-160 will give you extra detail having its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The fresher S33 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
![Nikon S33 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison Nikon S33 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S33-vs-Olympus-VG-160-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S33 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S33 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S33 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S33-vs-Olympus-VG-160-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S33 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S33 | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S33 | Olympus VG-160 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2015-02-10 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/3.1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 4.7 x 3.5mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 16.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 7cm |
Focal length multiplier | 7.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.7fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p), 320 x 240 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221g (0.49 lb) | 125g (0.28 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 66 x 27mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 165 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL19 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, smile timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $150 | $90 |