Nikon S33 vs Olympus VR-320
91 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
94 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Nikon S33 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3.1" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 221g - 110 x 66 x 27mm
- Introduced February 2015
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Renewed by Olympus VR-330
Photography Glossary Nikon S33 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Nikon S33 vs Olympus VR-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S33 (13MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the S33 (1/3.1") and VR-320 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S33 was announced 3 years later than the VR-320 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the S33 grades versus the VR-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S33 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S33 and Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S33 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S33 over the Olympus VR-320
| S33 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 | July 2011 | Fresher by 44 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon S33
| VR-320 | S33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Nikon S33 and Olympus VR-320
| S33 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Nikon S33 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S33 has got outer measurements of 110mm x 66mm x 27mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S33 vs Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the S33 compared to the VR-320.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S33 and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S33 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing purely by looking at specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the S33 and VR-320.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The S33 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus VR-320 will give you extra detail with its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The fresher S33 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S33 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Nikon S33 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S33 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S33 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2015-02-10 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 4.7 x 3.5mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 16.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 7.7 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.7 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p), 320 x 240 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 158g (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 66 x 27mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, smile timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $150 | $179 |