Nikon S3300 vs Nikon S6300

On this page, we will be looking at the Nikon S3300 versus Nikon S6300, both Small Sensor Compact cameras and both are created by Nikon. The sensor resolution of the S3300 (16MP) and the S6300 (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The S3300 was unveiled very close to the S6300 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the S3300 matches up against the S6300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

This is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S3300 & Nikon Coolpix S6300. The full galleries are available at Nikon S3300 Gallery & Nikon S6300 Gallery.

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon S3300 features physical dimensions of 95mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Nikon S6300 has specifications of 94mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check out the Nikon S3300 versus Nikon S6300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the S3300 vs the S6300.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the S3300 and S6300 is 96 and 94 respectively.

In many cases, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the S3300 and S6300.

As you can see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of files although you should consider the age of the cameras into account.