Nikon S3300 vs Olympus FE-5010
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
![Nikon Coolpix S3300 front Nikon Coolpix S3300 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300/Nikon-S3300-front.jpg)
![Olympus FE-5010 front Olympus FE-5010 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-FE-5010/Olympus-FE-5010-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-156mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 128g - 95 x 58 x 19mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Released January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Nikon S3300 versus Olympus FE-5010, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Nikon and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the S3300 (16MP) and FE-5010 (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The S3300 was released 3 years after the FE-5010 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the S3300 grades versus the FE-5010 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S3300 and Olympus FE-5010. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon S3300 Gallery and Olympus FE-5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S3300 over the Olympus FE-5010
S3300 | FE-5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 38 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Nikon S3300
FE-5010 | S3300 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S3300 and Olympus FE-5010
S3300 | FE-5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S3300 has got exterior dimensions of 95mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Olympus FE-5010 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S3300 versus Olympus FE-5010 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the S3300 against the FE-5010.
![Nikon S3300 vs Olympus FE-5010 size comparison Nikon S3300 vs Olympus FE-5010 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300-vs-Olympus-FE-5010-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S3300 and FE-5010 is 96 and 96 respectively.
![Nikon S3300 vs Olympus FE-5010 top view buttons comparison Nikon S3300 vs Olympus FE-5010 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300-vs-Olympus-FE-5010-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specifications. The image underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S3300 and FE-5010.
Plainly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Nikon S3300 to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The fresher S3300 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
![Nikon S3300 vs Olympus FE-5010 sensor size comparison Nikon S3300 vs Olympus FE-5010 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300-vs-Olympus-FE-5010-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S3300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S3300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300-vs-Olympus-FE-5010-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus FE-5010 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S3300 | Olympus FE-5010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S3300 | Olympus FE-5010 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-02-01 | 2009-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 36-180mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 128 gr (0.28 lbs) | 130 gr (0.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 58 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $99 | $130 |