Nikon S3300 vs Olympus VR-320
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-156mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 128g - 95 x 58 x 19mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S3300 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Nikon S3300 and Olympus VR-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S3300 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S3300 was announced 7 months after the VR-320 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the S3300 scores against the VR-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S3300 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S3300 and Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S3300 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S3300 over the Olympus VR-320
| S3300 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2012 |  | July 2011 | More modern by 7 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon S3300
| VR-320 | S3300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Nikon S3300 and Olympus VR-320
| S3300 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Nikon S3300 provides outside measurements of 95mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S3300 and Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the S3300 compared to the VR-320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S3300 and VR-320 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the S3300 and VR-320.
Clearly, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Nikon S3300 to provide you with more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher S3300 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S3300 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S3300 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-02-01 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 128 grams (0.28 lbs) | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 58 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $99 | $179 |