Nikon S3300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-156mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 128g - 95 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Nikon S3300 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the S3300 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the S3300 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe S3300 was brought out 10 months prior to the XZ-2 iHS so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the S3300 scores versus the XZ-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S3300 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S3300 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S3300 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
S3300 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Nikon S3300
XZ-2 iHS | S3300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | February 2012 | More recent by 10 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S3300 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
S3300 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and size. The Nikon S3300 comes with outer dimensions of 95mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Nikon S3300 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the S3300 and the XZ-2 iHS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S3300 and XZ-2 iHS is 96 and 85 respectively.
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements only by going over a spec sheet. The visual below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S3300 and XZ-2 iHS.
Clearly, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The S3300 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Nikon S3300 will offer you more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos more aggressively. The older S3300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S3300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S3300 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S3300 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-02-01 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-6.5 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 128g (0.28 lbs) | 346g (0.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 58 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 pictures | 340 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $99 | $450 |