Nikon S3300 vs Samsung DV300F

On this page, we are reviewing the Nikon S3300 vs Samsung DV300F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Nikon and Samsung. The image resolution of the S3300 (16MP) and the DV300F (16MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The S3300 was brought out within a month of the DV300F and they are of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the S3300 matches up versus the DV300F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S3300 & Samsung DV300F. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon S3300 Gallery & Samsung DV300F Gallery.

For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Nikon S3300 enjoys outside dimensions of 95mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung DV300F has proportions of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).

Check the Nikon S3300 vs Samsung DV300F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the S3300 vs the DV300F.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the S3300 and DV300F is 96 and 96 respectively.

Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The pic here might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S3300 and DV300F.

As you can tell, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of files however you might want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account.