Clicky

Nikon S3300 vs Samsung PL200

Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
32
Overall
36
Nikon Coolpix S3300 front
 
Samsung PL200 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
22
Overall
31

Nikon S3300 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs

Nikon S3300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-156mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
  • 128g - 95 x 58 x 19mm
  • Released February 2012
Samsung PL200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
  • Announced July 2010
Photography Glossary

Nikon S3300 vs Samsung PL200 Overview

In this article, we are comparing the Nikon S3300 versus Samsung PL200, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Nikon and Samsung. The resolution of the S3300 (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The S3300 was introduced 19 months after the PL200 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the S3300 grades versus the PL200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon S3300 over the Samsung PL200

 S3300 PL200 
AnnouncedFebruary 2012July 2010Newer by 19 months
Manual focus Dial precise focus

Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Nikon S3300

 PL200 S3300 
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Nikon S3300 and Samsung PL200

 S3300 PL200 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Nikon S3300 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S3300 enjoys outer dimensions of 95mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung PL200 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).

Examine the Nikon S3300 versus Samsung PL200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the S3300 against the PL200.

Nikon S3300 vs Samsung PL200 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S3300 and PL200 is 96 and 94 respectively.

Nikon S3300 vs Samsung PL200 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S3300 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specifications. The image below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the S3300 and PL200.

Plainly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Nikon S3300 to show extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The more modern S3300 should have a benefit in sensor technology.

Nikon S3300 vs Samsung PL200 sensor size comparison

Nikon S3300 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S3300 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon S3300 Portrait photography details
Samsung PL200 Portrait photography details
40
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
provides face detect focusing
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
28
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Nikon S3300
Street photography with Samsung PL200
63
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (128g)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Nikon S3300
Sports photography with Samsung PL200
40
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low battery pack (180 CIPA)
lack of phase detect AF
38
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Nikon S3300 Travel photography details
Samsung PL200 Travel photography details
66
lighter than competition in class (128 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (26mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
low battery pack (180 per charge)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
58
decent megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse function
does not offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Nikon S3300 Landscape photography details
Samsung PL200 Landscape photography details
41
has manual focus
rather wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual exposure
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
low battery pack (180 per charge)
does not have Timelapse mode
37
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S3300 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung PL200 as a Vlogging camera
33
rather wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focusing
lighter than competition in class (128 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone port
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Nikon S3300 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S3300 and Samsung PL200
 Nikon Coolpix S3300Samsung PL200
General Information
Brand Name Nikon Samsung
Model Nikon Coolpix S3300 Samsung PL200
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2012-02-01 2010-07-21
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-156mm (6.0x) 31-217mm (7.0x)
Max aperture f/3.5-6.5 f/3.3-5.5
Macro focus distance 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 4.60 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format MPEG-4 H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 128g (0.28 lbs) 170g (0.37 lbs)
Dimensions 95 x 58 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 pictures -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model EN-EL19 BP70A
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $99 $0