Nikon S3300 vs Samsung ST150F
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58ac3/58ac33832401cb3252c4f251de279003c1374538" alt="Nikon Coolpix S3300 front Nikon Coolpix S3300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2b34/d2b34be0402f7c9fe3c7c9ed4462bc8843f628b6" alt="Samsung ST150F front Samsung ST150F front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Nikon S3300 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-156mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 128g - 95 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Released January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Nikon S3300 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Nikon S3300 vs Samsung ST150F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Nikon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S3300 (16MP) and the ST150F (16MP) is relatively close and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The S3300 was unveiled 11 months earlier than the ST150F so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the S3300 scores versus the ST150F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Nikon S3300 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S3300 & Samsung ST150F. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon S3300 Gallery & Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S3300 over the Samsung ST150F
S3300 | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Nikon S3300
ST150F | S3300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2012 | More modern by 11 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Nikon S3300 and Samsung ST150F
S3300 | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Nikon S3300 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Nikon S3300 provides outer dimensions of 95mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST150F has measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S3300 vs Samsung ST150F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the S3300 and the ST150F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68e34/68e34f307992a1b3642472d2ca38f6376847d295" alt="Nikon S3300 vs Samsung ST150F size comparison Nikon S3300 vs Samsung ST150F size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S3300 and ST150F is 96 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d37a1/d37a13845e965e295e416d05a0f4d33153dc3ace" alt="Nikon S3300 vs Samsung ST150F top view buttons comparison Nikon S3300 vs Samsung ST150F top view buttons comparison"
Nikon S3300 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through specifications. The image underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the S3300 and ST150F.
Plainly, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of files although you may want to factor the age of the cameras into account. The more aged S3300 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a2d5/3a2d5daf9d033a7c0345dbc1aa75678e8c889d23" alt="Nikon S3300 vs Samsung ST150F sensor size comparison Nikon S3300 vs Samsung ST150F sensor size comparison"
Nikon S3300 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6493e/6493ed7e6df72352bfc917381612eb53dfb90e6e" alt="Nikon S3300 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S3300 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Nikon S3300 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S3300 | Samsung ST150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Samsung |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S3300 | Samsung ST150F |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-02-01 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.5 | f/2.5-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 128 grams (0.28 lb) | 114 grams (0.25 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 58 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $99 | $300 |