Nikon S4300 vs Olympus TG-310
Portability
95 Imaging
38 Features
39 Overall
38
95 Imaging
38 Features
39 Overall
38
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Nikon S4300 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
Nikon S4300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-156mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 139g - 96 x 59 x 21mm
- Announced February 2012
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S4300 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Nikon S4300 versus Olympus TG-310, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the S4300 (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S4300 was launched 14 months after the TG-310 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the S4300 matches up vs the TG-310 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Nikon S4300 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S4300 & Olympus TG-310. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon S4300 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S4300 over the Olympus TG-310
| S4300 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 14 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Nikon S4300
| TG-310 | S4300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S4300 and Olympus TG-310
| S4300 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Nikon S4300 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon S4300 has got outside measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 139 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Nikon S4300 versus Olympus TG-310 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the S4300 vs the TG-310.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S4300 and TG-310 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S4300 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by looking at technical specs. The pic below may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the S4300 and TG-310.
As you can tell, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Nikon S4300 to give greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger S4300 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Nikon S4300 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Nikon S4300 Portrait photography details
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography details
megapixel count decent (16MP)
includes face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
includes face detect focus
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Street photography with Nikon S4300
Street photography with Olympus TG-310
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers touch focus
lighter than others (139g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than competitors (155 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Nikon S4300 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Sports photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (180 per charge)
no phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
includes tracking focus
environment sealing
max frames per second very slow (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (150 per charge)
lack of phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Nikon S4300
Travel photography with Olympus TG-310
lighter than others (139 grams)
offers touch focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (26mm)
does not have Timelapse function
terrible battery pack (180 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competitors (155 grams)
environment sealing
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
terrible battery life (150 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Nikon S4300 Landscape photography info
Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography info
really wide (26mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
terrible battery pack (180 per charge)
does not have Timelapse function
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
no manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
terrible battery life (150 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Nikon S4300 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Vlogging camera
really wide (26mm)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focus
lighter than others (139 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone port
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
lighter than competitors (155g)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Nikon S4300 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S4300 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S4300 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-02-01 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 139 grams (0.31 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 59 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | 150 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $119 | $0 |