Nikon S4300 vs Panasonic FX75
Portability
95 Imaging
38 Features
39 Overall
38
95 Imaging
38 Features
39 Overall
38
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Nikon S4300 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
Nikon S4300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-156mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 139g - 96 x 59 x 21mm
- Announced February 2012
Panasonic FX75
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Launched June 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S4300 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Nikon S4300 vs Panasonic FX75, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Nikon and Panasonic. The resolution of the S4300 (16MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is very close and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S4300 was introduced 21 months after the FX75 making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the S4300 grades versus the FX75 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S4300 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S4300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S4300 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S4300 over the Panasonic FX75
| S4300 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 21 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Nikon S4300
| FX75 | S4300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S4300 and Panasonic FX75
| S4300 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Nikon S4300 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you should think about its weight and volume. The Nikon S4300 offers outer dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 139 grams (0.31 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has sizing of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S4300 vs Panasonic FX75 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the S4300 against the FX75.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the S4300 and FX75 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S4300 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through specifications. The pic below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the S4300 and FX75.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Nikon S4300 to render greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images more aggressively. The younger S4300 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Nikon S4300 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Nikon S4300
Portrait photography with Panasonic FX75
resolution is good (16MP)
includes face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Nikon S4300 Street photography advice
Panasonic FX75 Street photography advice
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
boasts focus by touch
lighter than average (139g)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
image stabilization (Optical)
includes focus via touch
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Nikon S4300 Sports photography details
Panasonic FX75 Sports photography details
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
includes tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (180 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
max fps very slow (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Nikon S4300 Travel photography features
Panasonic FX75 Travel photography features
lighter than average (139 grams)
boasts focus by touch
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
bad battery pack (180 CIPA)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
includes focus via touch
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.2)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Nikon S4300
Landscape photography with Panasonic FX75
relatively wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual exposure
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
bad battery pack (180 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Nikon S4300
Vlogging with Panasonic FX75
relatively wide (26mm)
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
lighter than average (139 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic socket
really wide (24mm)
touch screen
image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.2)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon S4300 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S4300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Panasonic |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S4300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-02-01 | 2010-06-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-6.5 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 139g (0.31 lb) | 165g (0.36 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 59 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $119 | $139 |