Nikon S4300 vs Samsung SL202
95 Imaging
38 Features
39 Overall
38
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Nikon S4300 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-156mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 139g - 96 x 59 x 21mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Other Name is PL50
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S4300 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Below is a extended review of the Nikon S4300 and Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Nikon and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the S4300 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe S4300 was brought out 2 years later than the SL202 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the S4300 matches up vs the SL202 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S4300 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S4300 and Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S4300 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S4300 over the Samsung SL202
| S4300 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 | February 2009 | More recent by 36 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Nikon S4300
| SL202 | S4300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S4300 and Samsung SL202
| S4300 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Nikon S4300 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Nikon S4300 features outside dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 139 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S4300 and Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the S4300 compared to the SL202.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S4300 and SL202 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S4300 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The photograph below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the S4300 and SL202.
All in all, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Nikon S4300 to resolve more detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger S4300 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon S4300 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon S4300 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S4300 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S4300 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-02-01 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 139 gr (0.31 lbs) | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 59 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $119 | $140 |