Clicky

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-4030

Portability
95
Imaging
40
Features
26
Overall
34
Nikon Coolpix S5200 front
 
Olympus FE-4030 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Key Specs

Nikon S5200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 3200
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-156mm (F) lens
  • 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2013
Olympus FE-4030
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
  • Released January 2010
Photography Glossary

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Overview

In this article, we will be contrasting the Nikon S5200 versus Olympus FE-4030, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S5200 (16MP) and the FE-4030 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The S5200 was unveiled 3 years after the FE-4030 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the S5200 grades vs the FE-4030 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Olympus FE-4030

 S5200 FE-4030 
ReleasedJanuary 2013January 2010More modern by 38 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Nikon S5200

 FE-4030 S5200 

Common features in the Nikon S5200 and Olympus FE-4030

 S5200 FE-4030 
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon S5200 comes with outer dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Olympus FE-4030 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs).

Look at the Nikon S5200 versus Olympus FE-4030 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the S5200 compared to the FE-4030.

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-4030 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the S5200 and FE-4030 is 95 and 95 respectively.

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-4030 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The image below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the S5200 and FE-4030.

As you can tell, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Nikon S5200 to produce greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more modern S5200 should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-4030 sensor size comparison

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon S5200 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus FE-4030 as a Portrait photography camera
30
decent MP (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
28
MP count good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Nikon S5200 Street photography details
Olympus FE-4030 Street photography details
48
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
48
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Nikon S5200 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus FE-4030 as a Sports photography camera
28
decent MP (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery life (160 per charge)
does not have phase detect autofocus
35
MP count good (14 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Nikon S5200 Travel photography highlights
Olympus FE-4030 Travel photography highlights
68
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
no Time Lapse mode
not so great battery life (160 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
65
MP count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Nikon S5200
Landscape photography with Olympus FE-4030
42
reasonably wide (26mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
not so great battery life (160 per charge)
no Time Lapse mode
33
relatively wide (26mm)
MP count good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S5200 Vlogging features
Olympus FE-4030 Vlogging features
33
reasonably wide (26mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
no mic socket
26
relatively wide (26mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S5200 and Olympus FE-4030
 Nikon Coolpix S5200Olympus FE-4030
General Information
Brand Name Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon Coolpix S5200 Olympus FE-4030
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2013-01-29 2010-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.16 x 4.62mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 125 64
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-156mm (6.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.6-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 4cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 5.80 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 146 gr (0.32 pounds) 146 gr (0.32 pounds)
Dimensions 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 160 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL19 -
Self timer - Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $130 $130