Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-5020
95 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-156mm (F) lens
- 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Announced July 2009
- Other Name is X-935
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-5020, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the S5200 (16MP) and FE-5020 (12MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S5200 was revealed 3 years later than the FE-5020 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the S5200 scores vs the FE-5020 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S5200 and Olympus FE-5020. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S5200 Gallery and Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Olympus FE-5020
| S5200 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | July 2009 | Fresher by 43 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Nikon S5200
| FE-5020 | S5200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S5200 and Olympus FE-5020
| S5200 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Nikon S5200 has outer measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-5020 has measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-5020 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the S5200 vs the FE-5020.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S5200 and FE-5020 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to see the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing a spec sheet. The visual below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the S5200 and FE-5020.
Clearly, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Nikon S5200 to render more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The younger S5200 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Olympus FE-5020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Olympus FE-5020 |
| Also called | - | X-935 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.10 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 146g (0.32 pounds) | 137g (0.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $160 |